Compare tools
Demotape vs ngrok. Share the app, not just a port.
ngrok gives you access. Demotape gives you access plus visibility into how someone actually used the app.
If the job is sharing a local app and understanding behavior instantly, Demotape is the better fit.
Where Demotape fits
Demotape fills the gap between raw tunnel access and real visibility. Share the app, then see what happened.
The difference at a glance
Use ngrok for access. Use Demotape when you need access plus understanding.
More than a tunnel
Demotape vs ngrok
ngrok
- •Securely expose local services to the internet
- •Great for APIs, webhooks, and debugging endpoints
- •Supports multiple tunnels, domains, and traffic inspection
Where it falls short
- –You still wire things together manually (frontend + API + auth)
- –No visibility into what the user actually does
- –Not designed for guided demos or feedback loops
- –A shared URL still leaves you asking what happened after they clicked it
DemoTape
- ✓Shares your full app (not just a port)
- ✓Automatically detects and connects services
- ✓Lets you see exactly how someone interacts with it
- ✓Turns one shared link into a replayable feedback loop
ngrok exposes your app. Demotape helps you understand what happened inside it.
If the job is simple access, ngrok fits. If the job is feedback, debugging, or early product review, Demotape fits better.
With ngrok, you send a URL. With Demotape, you get the session back.
When to use each
Why developers switch
Stop guessing. Start seeing.
Stop deploying just to get feedback.
Stop sending new preview links.
Stop asking “what did you click?”
Run one command. Share a link. See what happened.
Try it in under 10 seconds.
$ npm install -g @demotape.dev/cli$ demotapeNo SDK. No setup. No friction.
Start sharing your app instantly.